I’m Andrew Cooper. I’ve been a
Green Party Councillor in Kirklees, in West Yorkshire for the last 17 years..
One of my more recent roles is as a member of the EU Committee of the Regions.
This little known body informs the EU about the impact of its policies at a
local level. I was appointed to the politically balanced 24 member UK
delegation last year as the nominee of the Independent Group of Cllrs on the Local
Government Association. As such I represent Independent, Green and UKIP Cllrs. I
guess that makes me Nigel Farage’s Spokesperson in Europe on Local Government.
Fortunately I don’t think he knows this.
The Referendum Campaign has been
eventful. The bit I found most amusing was when the Vote Leave Campaign Bus
visited Harrogate and parked illegally. They were duly ticketed by the local
Council. Vote Leave rejected the ticket saying that as they were part of the
Referendum Campaign and therefore were exempt. Now my brother is the
Conservative Leader of Harrogate Borough Council and he tweeted the following “Let's see if they pay like everyone else has
to. It's day one and counting #votepayup”- so the Brexitters don’t just
have a problem with EU Laws but seemingly some UK ones as well!
In the last European Parliament
Elections the Green Party took a 3 yeses approach to the EU.
Yes to Reform
Yes to Remaining
Yes to a Referendum
Yes Yes Yes! The last time I heard
3 yeses in the same sentence was in the film ‘When Harry met Sally’ Somehow our 3 yeses never reached the same
level of enthusiasm.
Yes to Reform because we know that the
EU is by no means a perfect institution, the undue influence of big business
over decision making, there’s TTIP that puts the interests of big business
before democracy, there was the heavy
handed authoritarian austerity driven approach that was taken by the EU with
the Greek Government. These are just 3
examples that we could spend an entire conference talking about.
But if an institution needs
reforming I’d start with one where a Government can get elected by 24% of the
electorate yet wield 100% of the power. I’d start with one where an unelected
House of Lords wields power with the support of religious clerics – just like
they do in Iran. I’d start with the UK Government. At least in the EU MEPs are
elected by a form of Proportional Representation, those who aren’t elected in
the European Commission need the support of the democratically elected European
Parliament to be appointed. So
personally (and this isn’t Green Party policy) I’d like a referendum on whether
Yorkshire should remain part of the UK or in fact become part of Scotland
because I don’t know about you but I feel more affinity with Scotland than with
a Government led by Etonian Toffs.
Yes to Remaining
Because fundamentally I believe
that people forget that the binding together of our nations is more than simply
an economic union but one that demonstrates the old Churchillian truism that “Jaw Jaw is better than War War”.
If we break those bonds of cooperation and friendship where that unravelling
will end doesn’t bear thinking about.
Yes to remaining because we live in
a globalised world with the impacts of big issues such as climate change, tax
avoidance and crime not stopping at political boundaries. They require action
by nations across borders.
Renewable Energy is a classic
example. The UK has an EU target of achieving 13% of our total energy from
Renewable Sources by 2020. Other nations are already exceeding their much
higher targets, while we in the UK slip behind. This is due to a lack of UK
Govt support for renewable energy. In the EU only Malta and Luxembourg are
producing less of their energy from Renewable sources than the UK. The point of
the EU target is that it makes the UK accountable, it compares us with others,
and unfortunately it shames us and if there’s one thing this lousy Government
needs it is shaming.
When the Paris agreement on Climate
Change was signed the agreed EU Carbon reduction targets came as an
amalgamation of different countries contributions. I regarded this as a huge
positive but the negative fly in the ointment was again our own Government NOT
the EU. At no point did they ask for the input of local Councils or Devolved
Administrations on how to reach this target, nor for our assistance or ideas on
how targets might be achieved. It’s almost as though we were irrelevant. UK
Government was behaving remotely as if we didn’t exist in pretty much the same
way that the Brexiteers regard the European Union treating the UK and its
interests.
If another Europe is to be possible I would
want it to be one where achieving EU targets is more strongly linked to action
on the ground. So where the EU has a target for improving energy efficiency I want
that to relate directly to warmer, healthier homes and working together to end
the misery of fuel poverty. This would be an example of a Europe that is
relevant to be peoples everyday lives. A Europe that has a common sense of
purpose for Social and Environmental Good. This is why I believe a better
Europe is not only possible but would be hugely popular.
We also said ‘Yes to A Referendum’
and that is the big uncertainty. There are those who say we shouldn’t have done
it. Why are our nations being used to try to solve an internal dispute in the
Conservative Party? Thats not going to work!
Of
course there are risks. With the EU Referendum we do not
know the outcome, peoples votes may be influenced by negative feelings or
cherry picked facts but we will have our shot at getting our message across
with a positive vision of a sustainable and progressive Europe. In my
experience what wins votes is passion, belief and shoe leather. So between now
and June 23rd let us use all these to get the result we need.
It is possible. Another Europe is
possible!
No comments:
Post a Comment