Monday, 29 October 2012

Bad Old Labour are back!

If proof were really required that the Conservatives were backing the Labour administration in Kirklees. It was confirmed beyond doubt Last week. The Conservatives backed the Labour Party's capital plan which included investment to assist the development of greenbelt land that only a few months ago they had been supposedly campaigning to protect during the LDF debate. You do wonder what the Conservatives really get out of this deal. All I can see is additional committee chairs Labour gave them along with the allowances that go with them. Their share of the chairs goes way beyond what they warrant on the basis of the proportion of seats they hold on the council. Of course those  Committee chairs have come at the expense of the Greens and Valley Independent Councillors who had the temerity to oppose the election of the 'Strong Leader'  Mehboob Khan.

Mehboob and the Labour Party are now behaving as if they had an overall majority. There is an arrogance there which seems to stem from their confidence in their own positions. At cabinet on Tuesday Cllr Khan fooled around with the webcam while I was speaking, Cllr Molly Walton expressed her annoyance at having to listen to anyone from a 'minor party' and Cllr McBride was his on his usual form 'we're Old Labour and we know best'.

Valid criticisms I had for the lack of any mention of carbon emissions in the West Yorkshire Transport Proposals were not regarded seriously. I asked for a carbon impact to be taken of the plan which encourages the development of a link to Leeds/Bradford airport. Cllr Khan's response was that he'll back jobs and homes before a reduction in carbon emissions. It seems like they have made their plans and are going to work out the carbon emissions impacts afterwards. As I explained at Full Council  it is a false conflict and a false choice to say you support jobs and homes over carbon emissions. You can promote jobs and homes without compromising our environment but you have to make the right choices and expanding Leeds/Bradford airport is clearly incompatible with any policy to address carbon emissions. If Labour are compromising on carbon emissions in this way they clearly do not believe or appreciate the size of the problem and are simply falling back into the unimaginative model of economic development based on growth at any price and any cost be it economic or environmental.

So here we are back with the old Labour attitudes I remember from the 1990s. Confidence in their position has lead to arrogance and a poor attitude to critics and criticism.

Use Starbucks 'Bucks' for flood defences

Richard Benyon MP addressing the LGA Flooding meeting

I was chairing the Local Goverment Association Annual Flooding Conference on Thursday. Floods Minister Richard Benyon (pictured) came along to tell us he hadn't resolved the issue of making insurance affordable for homes in flood risk areas and that the introduction of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems for new build houses would be delayed supposedly due to lobbying from the building industry over costs.

He went on to bemoan the fact that the private sector were not pulling their weight in providing funds for partnership funding for flood defence projects. I suggested that in lieu of their zero tax bill that Starbucks be approached to significantly contribute. This went down pretty well with the audience which included plenty of Tory Cllrs. He promised to take this idea to Cabinet but to be fair I think he thought I was joking. I wasn't.

Monday, 22 October 2012

PRESS RELEASE Greens come out against Shelley College proposals

The Greens support the Keep Shelley Pyramid campaign
 Proposals by the Head at Shelley College to extend provision down to years 7 and 8 have resulted in widespread concern from parents throughout the Shelley Pyramid and in the wider community. This has become possible since Shelley College attained Academy status allowing the Head to act without approval from the local council.

The Shelley College proposal if implemented would have a knock on effect throughout the local education system making Kirkburton and Scisset Middle Schools unviable with only one class year and putting huge pressure for places at First Schools which are already oversubscribed. The cost of building new classrooms and facilities would be placed on Kirklees Council’s already overstretched budget. There would also undoubtedly be significant new pressures on the road network around Shelley College, improvements to which would come at a cost.

Kirkburton Ward Councillor Robert Barraclough said,

“Both mine and my colleague Derek Hardcastle’s children went through the middle school system and it has worked well for them as it has for thousands of other children in our area.

Shelley College should abandon this proposal and seek to rebuild relationships with the First and Middle schools, working collaboratively to deliver a first class, stable educational environment for our children.”

Councillor Andrew Cooper who leads the Greens on Kirklees Council said,

“ It is unbelievable that a head teacher can put these sort of proposals forward with no accountability to democratically elected bodies like the Council. Just because Shelley College is at the top of the Shelley Pyramid does not give him the right to act like a Pharaoh. It shows a lack of respect for other schools and a scant disregard for the opinions of local people. I urge him to drop these proposals forthwith and recognise that he has overstepped the mark.

We strongly support the Save Shelley Pyramid campaign that is lead by local parents and would urge all other parties on Kirklees Council to do so also.”

Friday, 5 October 2012

Using EU Funding for EE Investment

The EU budget, in the crosshairs of the government, needs to be greener, not leaner and meaner,

It is now widely acknowledged that there is enormous potential to reap environmental, social and economic dividends through improving the energy efficiency of Europe's 160 million buildings. And yet actual investments in energy efficiency measures remain very small in comparison to this potential.

To achieve the EU objective of a 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency by 2020 (from 1990 levels), the European Investment Bank estimates that EUR 85 billion per year is needed, with EUR 60 billion per year required for buildings alone. The forthcoming EU budget for 2014-20, currently being negotiated, has a vital role to play here for the UK and Europe's other more developed countries as well as the less developed countries.

The future budget, expected to total around one trillion euros over seven years, seeks among other things to realise Europe 2020 objectives – supporting the shift towards a low-carbon economy in all sectors is paramount in the European commission's budget proposals to date. Backing this up, a figure of at least 20 percent of the total budget for climate change related activities has been put on the table by the commission. More specifically, a doubling of current allocations for energy efficiency and renewable energy to EUR 17 billion has also been proposed under the European Regional Development Fund.

Given the scale of the challenges we now face, these figures should be higher – some members of the European Parliament have recently been vocal in calling for this 20 percent 'climate mainstreaming' to be bumped up to 30 percent. Meanwhile, with some of the EU's larger member states, including the UK, pushing for real terms cuts in the future EU budget, there are growing fears that the budget's climate potential could be seriously impaired. Here's why this must not happen.

Kirklees Council in West Yorkshire, where I serve as a Green Party councillor, has been a leading local authority in the UK in addressing fuel poverty and improving the energy efficiency of people’s homes. An insulation programmethat we implemented between 2007 and 2011 offered free loft and cavity wall insulation to all households irrespective of income or tenure. Thousands of homes were insulated and Kirklees is recognised by the UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) as the council in the UK that has been most successful at insulating its housing stock.

The question now for Kirklees and hundreds of other councils up and down the UK is: where next?

The UK government's 'Green Deal' that has just been launched aims to improve insulation in 14 million of the UK's leaky homes. However, there is scepticsm from many quarters as to whether or not the Green Deal is fit for purpose. For one thing. the loans offered to improve the energy efficiency of people’s homes under the Green Deal are expected to be offering interest rates at around the seven percent mark, while in Germany similar loans are offered at one percent.

David Kennedy, chief executive of the government's official advisors, the Committee on climate change, has warned of the Green Deal's finance model: “We think there is a significant risk in leaving it to the market, as that has never worked anywhere in the world and is unlikely to happen in the UK.”

The Green Deal's unique selling point is that the loans offered to home owners are supposed to be more than covered by the savings made as result of the measures installed. This is called 'the Golden Rule', but more expensive measures such as solid wall insulation will have to be highly subsidised by the utilities through the Energy Company Obligation.

Consumer resistance to solid wall insulation is expected to be high mainly due to aesthetic reasons. The Golden Rule is not guaranteed, and changes in people’s circumstances or how they use the home could impact negatively (or positively) on savings made. Industry is expecting a slow start for the Green Deal and in traditional loft and cavity wall insulation sectors a downturn in orders and staff redundancies seems likely. Early attacks on the Green Deal from the UK press are underway and will probably accelerate as the scheme is launched.

The Green Deal is being introduced at a time when ‘feed in tariffs’ for solar PV and other renewable technologies are being massively cut, leading to a reduction in capacity in the micro-generation sector. It is against this backdrop that the UK's ability to achieve an array of EU environmental targets must be judged.

When asked DECC officials are bullish about being able to hit the EU target for 16 percent of total energy from renewable sources by 2020. The evidence would indicate otherwise, particularly with regard to the renewable heat and transport sectors.

There are other avenues, though, to ensure positive action on energy efficiency in the UK materialises – this is likely to occur where local authorities and energy utilities disregard problematic policies such as the Green Deal and instead develop their own programmes. Local authorities have the 'reach' for this. They have access to community networks and to a great extent the trust of their communities as official bodies where people feel they have a recourse if they have concerns.

Energy utilities do have funding of GBP 1.3 Billion per year through the Energy Company Obligation, but if matched funding is required to make a scheme fly then local authorities, like many public bodies, are highly constrained both in terms of capital and revenue expenditure.

This is where EU funds could really make a difference, bridging the gap between local schemes that lack finance but that nonetheless have every likelihood of succeeding.

Such an opportunity has already been grasped in France, where social housing organisations have rapidly deployed 320 million euros of European Regional Development Fund money to improve energy efficiency in existing housing. This European finance triggered investments of 2.2 billion euros, created 15,000 local jobs and has resulted in financial savings of 98 euros per month per household thanks to a 40 percent average decrease in heating costs.

The best route for such EU funds at a time of limited budgets would be via a route where councils and energy utilities have to demonstrate the robust nature of their proposals in terms of delivery as the key to open EU funding. High quality, 'deep' renovation proposals are essential here – cosmetic fixes such as replacement windows should be a non-starter.

And the UK could maximise leverage on EU funds to co-finance projects if the UK government sets the EU funding element to cover 75 percent of costs. This will ensure we get more back from the EU on projects that give us a better deal from Europe, and certainly a greener one.

Designing such programmes coud be developed in conjunction with the Local Government Association (LGA), the representative body for councils in England and Wales. The LGA is regularly engaging with DECC on government policy and is one of the most informed bodies in the country on the delivery of energy efficiency programmes.

These are difficult times for many sectors of industry, but through imaginative links between the EU and local government bodies in the UK, we can produce imaginative and effective programmes that deliver carbon and financial savings while generating jobs and, for many, much needed hope.

Casual Vacancies - Kirkburton Parish Council

Last Night 2 casual vacancies were filled for the Shepley Ward in Kirkburton Parish Council by Dave Bradbury and Robert Edmunds both of whom are residents of the village and both will sit as Independent Parish Councillors. Other Candidates who put themselves forward were Sandra Harling a former Parish Council employee, Neil Harris and former Conservative Parish Councillor for Shepley John Taylor.  Dave Bradbury as a stonemason by trade and is responsible for the guidestoops on the Kirkburton Parish Walks. Robert Edmunds narrowly missed out on being elected to the Parish in 2011 coming 4th. He works for the police in control room operations.

There had been some rumours that a by election would be called but fortunately this did not occur as it could have cost the Parish Council around £10,000 from it's meagre budget. As it was a co option a vote was taken of members present following short speeches by each of the 3 candidates who were able to attend the meeting, Messers Bradbury, Edmunds and Taylor. " seperate votes were taken by Parish Councillors for each of the vacant seats and the results were as follows

First Vacancy

Bradbury 11 - Elected
Edmunds 5
Harling 2
Harris 0
Taylor 3

Second Vacancy

Edmunds 17 - Elected
Harling 0
Harris 0
Taylor 4