Flytipping on farmland |
The revised Memorandum
of Understanding between the Department of Energy and Climate Change and the
Local Government Association was up for discussion. There had been concern that
DECC had on occasions implemented relevant policies (such as changes to Feed In
Tariffs) with little or no consultation with Local Authorities. I made 2
contributions on the proposed shared statement between DECC and LGA. One to
acknowledge that Councils had been the instigators of many of the leading
energy efficiency projects that have occurred in recent years and that it is they and
not central government that have the expertise and experience to deliver action
on climate change.. Another point I made was that simply reducing local
authority estate emissions on its own was not enough. If this was achieved
simply through the sale of old energy inefficient buildings this and not
through improvements to the existing stock this would not necessarily mean any
reductions in carbon emissions in the area just a transfer of those emissions
from the public sector to the private sector.
DEFRA are to hold a
Flytipping Summit in July. One proposal on their agenda is to encourage
Councils to exempt farmers from costs for disposing of flytipped materials.
This proposal is fraught with difficulties. A small minority of unscrupulous
farmers could effectively run illicit waste disposal businesses at no cost to
themselves. There is also the question as to why should we exempt farmers as
opposed to any other private landowner and why should cash strapped local
authorities shoulder the cost of disposing of this waste. We should be
focussing on the problem of flytipping not letting one particular group off the
costs of paying for it. This proposal from DEFRA looks like an unworkable non
starter.
The ongoing welfare
reforms was another contentious issue on the agenda. The proposed benefits cap,
the size criteria for under occupied rented housing and benefit payments no
longer go to private landlords but straight to tenants all seem designed to make
life more difficult for those on low incomes and to generate more homeless
families and suffering. Government seems to have developed these policies believing there is a mass availability of
alternative cheap accommodation in other areas and that households would be
able to move many miles to find a job in another area with cheaper
accommodation. The broad thrust of this
was that households in London and the South East would move from the
overcrowded and expensive south to the cheaper North where there are apparently
lots of jobs. Clearly a policy not in
any way related to the real world.
I informed the meeting
that I had been in touch with Councillors in Calderdale asking for feedback on
issues arising from the recent floods in
my capacity as the Chair of the LGA’s Inland Flood Risk Working Group.
Todmorden, Mytholmroyd and Hebden Bridge were badly affected by the recent
floods and I am keen to ensure our contacts with DEFRA on flooding issues are
informed by real life experiences from people and communities affected.
No comments:
Post a Comment