A blog by Green Party Councillor Andrew Cooper about Green Politics, action on Climate Change, Kirklees Council and our activity to improve the local and global environment (and also anything that I fancy talking about) Promoted and published by A Cooper, 76 Brockholes Lane, Holmfirth HD9 7EB
Sunday, 29 December 2013
Wednesday, 18 December 2013
Great day in Grimsby
Here's some pics from a recent fact finding trip to Grimsby organised by Vicky Dunn (number 3 on the Green Party Euro list)
An early morning visit to Grimsby Fish Market where we really did talk about the price of fish and marine conservation.
A visit to Renewable Energy Systems to hear bout the growth of the offshor wind sector and the positive impact on the Grimsby economy.
Then off to visit a great community food growing project
A quick stop at Cleethorpes Pier before a lunch of sustainably sourced fish.
Sunday, 15 December 2013
PRESS RELEASE School League tables - Pupils are children not widgets
![]() |
| Do School League Tables make pupils 'just another brick in the wall''? |
A leading Green Party politician has criticised Government
league tables that show nearly half the areas with primary schools not meeting
new nationally set targets are in Yorkshire.
Cllr Andrew Cooper, who is lead Green candidate for
Yorkshire & The Humber in the European elections next year, said he was at
least as concerned about the process of league tables as he was about the
findings. Greens would abolish league tables as they are currently devised and
used.
“These targets are nationally set and take no account of
local issues – it is telling that many of the schools identified are in areas
of social deprivation which have been especially badly affected by the
Government’s austerity drive. Using league tables, which by default rank
schools above or below others, is a crude mechanism for determining real
educational needs and outcomes. It is not helpful and simply stigmatises
schools where teachers, parents and pupils are often working incredibly hard in
spite of frequently lacking resources or having to keep adjusting to changing
diktats from central Government.”
Cllr Cooper went on to say, ”This comes in the same week we
have heard that the Coalition’s flagship policy on free schools is running three
times over budget and failing to meet need in areas with oversubscribed places.
It is dreadful for the Government to now compound this assault on education by
using a one dimensional process to assess our primary schools.”
Cllr Cooper added, “Greens want a very different approach to
education. We support a model where needs are determined more locally but on a
community basis rather than in the way free schools are allowed to operate, and
in particular we want the education process to be one that is geared to
individual children’s needs rather than Michael Gove’s latest idea.”
He said that Greens support primary children starting
academic schooling at 6 rather than 5, which would be in line with successful
education systems such as those in several European countries. Prior to that,
building on the Surestart programme, a system of free nursery education should
be available with an emphasis on learning through play. Greens would also adopt
the Scandinavian model of “all through schools” where pupils would remain in
the same school throughout their education but the schools themselves would
become more local in their nature and smaller than some of the super-sized
establishments found across the UK today.
“We want schools that are linked to the local community, not
Whitehall, and that are central to the local area and focus on the varying
needs of children,” said Cllr Cooper. “The Government has a two-faced approach
of encouraging elitist free schools which drift off in their own direction but
then imposes a one-size-fits-all assessment which simply tarnishes the
reputation of less well resouced schools and even their local area. “
Cllr Cooper concluded, ”Like any parent, I want my children
to have an education that meets their needs, not some national target. Schools
should not be exam factories; pupils are children, not widgets.”
ENDS
Green Party youth and education policy: http://policy.greenparty.org.uk/ed#Youth
League tables story: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/main-topics/education/primaries-struggle-to-hit-new-tougher-standards-1-6313206
Free schools costs: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-25304382
Saturday, 14 December 2013
Mono Mania
![]() |
| A monorail goes up New Street - from 2025 Kirklees Transport Vision |
One anecdote from the last Full Council meeting was my mock proposal to have a monorail from Scapegoat Hill, through Golcar and Milnsbridge and on into Town. The idea was to highlight the fantasy proposal from the Lib Dems about having some flyover bridge over Milnsbridge by coming up with something similarly financially unfeasible. For more background see my 'What's pink and hangs from a lamppost' blogpost about the Golcar By election.
It was during my speech that Tory Leader Robert Light piped up and said, 'The monorail was our idea!'. Apart from completely missing the point that I was taking the 'michael' out of the Lib Dems he was also wrong. Back in the days of plenty, 2005 to be exact, I asked for a feasibility study to be carried out into having a monorail link between Huddersfield Railway Station going up Leeds Road and past the Stadium on up to Cooper Bridge and back. The idea was to provide an alternative link for people going to the shopping up Leeds Rd, going to the Cinema or to watch a match without using the car. Leeds Road is a hotspot for traffic pollution and is an Air Quality Management Area so it would be one way of addressing this. The following day from the meeting I put the word 'monorail' into my search facility in my Outlook account and hey presto on the 14/2/2005 popped up the Green Party Budget amendment for that year compiled for us by the Ex Finanace Chief for Kirklees Dick Hewitson and there it stated:-
Provide
a detailed feasibility for a public transport link between Huddersfield Town
Centre, Leeds Road and Cooper Bridge - The 'Cooper Monorail'
This was from the Press Release we put out at the time:-
Leeds Road is a hive
of industrial and retail units, the Galpharm stadium and the UCI. With the
possible expansion of industrial outlets on the Leeds Road corridor this puts
increasing pressure on traffic congestion and increasingly dangerous levels of
low air quality. “This is a typical example of the ‘build it and they will
come’ mentality where no thought has been given to how people will be able to
get to places other than by road. Greens are proposing a detailed feasibility
study into alternative modes of transport from Huddersfield Town Centre up
Leeds Road and to Cooper Bridge. These will include the serious evaluation of
dedicated bus lanes, trams and monorails as alternatives to the car.” Said
Councillor Cooper.
I'm pretty sure I'd asked Dick Hewitson to take the 'Cooper Monorail' out of the final version of our Budget Amendment. At the time it was a bit of a 'mono mania' I had and the sort of Councillor enthusiasm that Council Officers may be sceptical about but can't really ignore if it is part of budget discussions. The reason I was pushing it was because whenever I saw a futuristic city ('Logans Run' springs to mind) they always had monorails as their preferred form of public transport. Electric non polluting and modern. The idea was taken up and some work was done on it during the Tory minority administration but like some other notable acheivements during their time such as 'free insulation' their origins came from the Green Party.
The thing to take away from all this is that with imposed local austerity, significant improvements to local transport are stalled and in some cases going backwards. Many local bus service are under threat and slow and unreliable train services like the Penistone Line limp on. Meanwhile the Coalition has its own 'mono mania' with the £50-80 Billion HS2 which it continues to bulldoze through despite robust evidence of its non-benefits. Governments should be judged, in part, by their vision of the future. For the Coalition it is big, national with highly contested benefits. The future has to be local, of significance to health and quality of life and benefit to communities and local economies. I think the 'Cooper Monorail' would stand up to scrutiny against HS2 on those parameters at least.
Kirklees is not the first place to consider a monorail the small town of Springfield in the USA also gave it some serious thought
Sunday, 8 December 2013
Bridge over the River Colne
Last Wednesdays Full Council meeting saw a motion from the Liberal Democrats calling on the Kirklees Labour Cabinet to "undertake the work that is needed to build a second bridge in Milnsbridge" to help relieve congestion through the busy village. Just to recap, there was a by-election last month in the Golcar Ward which the Liberal Democrats won after promising to "Stop Labours Gridlock" in Milnsbridge, or so it said on the signs said which they plastered all over the lamp posts. Of course it would cost millions and one thing Kirklees has got a lot less of is millions, so it was never a realistic option. Say the Council were to pay for a bridge, what services would be cut to pay for it. Shamefully the Labour Party and the Conservatives backed a feasibility study into the unfeasible bridge during the By Election campaign. I tried to put a bit of 'realism' into the debate by calling for a monorail from Scapegoat Hill through Golcar, Milnsbridge and into Huddersfield. My tongue was firmly in my cheek as I asked for something even more unfeasible than what all the other parties were asking for. Bizarrely Conservative Leader got up and insisted his Party were the first to think of a monorail.
It will be interesting to see what the Lib Dems put in their Council budget proposal in February on this one. If their government were to restore Council finances perhaps the Lib Dems could have a bridge.
Saturday, 7 December 2013
PRESS RELEASE - Transatlantic Trade Treaty threatens democracy, say Greens
Cllr Andrew Cooper, lead
Green Party Eurocandidate for Yorkshire & The Humber, has warned that an
American-EU trade treaty poses a major threat to our country. The US-EU
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) could be sealed in the
next few days and under cover of the benefits of free trade, it is set to
create an obscure process, known as the investor-state dispute mechanism, which
could strike down the democratic wishes of British citizens.
Andrew Cooper said:
“The Government has
repeatedly promised a referendum on any big changes to the EU, but, TTIP poses
by far the biggest potential threat on the sovereignty of Britain in decades
and it seems ready to just sign our rights away. The treaty is supposed to
harmonise regulations between Europe and the USA, but it will also create the
legal right to rip the heart out of any Government policies or laws which big
businesses decide are not in the interests of their shareholders.”
Many of TTIP’s
provisions are being kept confidential at the moment, but they are known to
include a right for private companies to sue Governments that introduce any
policies that go against their business objectives, especially if they harm
their profits. Under the investor-state dispute mechanism, private investors
will then be able to take legal action against Governments to reverse policies
and claim compensation from taxpayers.
Andrew Cooper continued:
“Look at the current
debate on energy policy and the different choices for Britain's future. Well, a
few years ago, Argentina introduced a range of policies on energy and economics
to rescue the country from a national financial crisis. Because they were
unhappy with these, five international energy companies used a similar treaty
arrangement to TTIP to sue the Argentinian Government, which has just agreed to
pay them $677 millionsto settle their claims. There are similar examples with
plain cigarette packets in Australia and cyanide water pollution from
gold-mining in El Salvador.”
“If the TTIP passes,
companies based anywhere in the world would be able to sue over laws on
environmental protection, renewables commitment, health and so on, whenever EU
rules are tougher than US ones or affect profit. For example, in food,
Yorkshire consumers could be forced to accept hormones in beef cattle and
chicken meat washed in chlorine and our farmers could have to surrender any
freedom to choose about GM crops.”
The US and British
Governments argue that the treaty will create jobs, but there is no evidence
for this – indeed, similar agreements in the past in other countries have led
to the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs.
“The Green Party is
raising the alarm – the other parties aren’t,” said Andrew Cooper. “The
costs will dramatically outweigh any benefits. Jobs could be lost here in
Yorkshire as well as elsewhere unless we accept lower and lower standards, and
even potentially dangerous ones, in both consumer and employee protection.”
“Caroline Lucas, Green MP, has tabled an Early
Day Motion in Parliament expressing concern about the investor-state dispute
mechanism – but she has received no support from the Coalition or Labour. Apart from the Greens,
the other parties at Westminster and in Europe seem spellbound by the desire
for free trade at any price, and the price could be high indeed.”
ENDS
----------------------
Contact: Andrew Cooper, 01484 667519 | 07721
348619
Green Party Energy Spokesperson; Yorkshire &
Humber lead Euro candidate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










